Planet Zog
Our vast Flight Through Entirety budget for this season has now run out completely, so this week we’re just hanging out in some dingy corridors listlessly rebelling against things for no reason. It’s here, it’s lame — it’s Timelash.
Welcome to voting cubicle three thirty
Our poll is still open: just head over to the shownotes for Episode 103 and cast your vote for the Pertwee story you would like us to ruin for you forever in an upcoming commentary episode. We’re in Australia here, so voting is compulsory.
Buy the story!
Timelash was released on DVD in 2007/2008. But you’d really be better of spending your money on plutonium and cigarettes (Amazon US) (Amazon UK)
Notes and links
Inspired by the events of this story, H. G. Wells will go on to create modern SF, probably, with classics like The Time Machine, The Island of Doctor Moreau and The Invisible Man, and with more terrible books like The Food of the Gods and In the Days of the Comet.
Fans of guest stars coming on to a science fiction programme and completely upstaging the lead will enjoy Colin Baker’s performance as Bayban in the Blakes 7 episode City at the Edge of the World.
At the start of the Virgin Missing Adventure Speed of Flight by Paul Leonard, the Doctor plans to take Jo Grant and Mike Yates to Karfel for an exciting adventure of some kind.
This story’s composer, Elizabeth Parker, was previously responsible for special sound on Blakes 7 from Season 2 onwards. She may have provided the music for Duel; she seems definitely to have provided the music for Gambit. She will go on to have resounding success with the music for David Attenborough’s The Living Planet.
How did we all react the last time the Loch Ness Monster appeared in Doctor Who? Listen to Episode 37: A Shaved Mr Snuffleupagus to find out.
Todd is horrified to learn that Brendan enjoyed Star Trek: The Next Generation bottle show Where Silence Has Lease.
In a nearby parallel universe where Timelash was never made, this week’s episode of Flight Through Entirety covers either Leviathan or The Song of the Space Whale.
And a very loud voice
We can’t get enough Colin Baker, of course, and so in an upcoming episode we plan to talk about some of his work for Big Finish.
If you want to prepare, here’s a list of the audios we plan to cover.
- Jubilee, by Rob Shearman
- The One Doctor, by Gareth Roberts and Clayton Hickman
- Doctor Who and the Pirates, by Jacqueline Rayner
- Criss-Cross, by Matt Fitton
Follow us!
Brendan is on Twitter as @brandybongos, Nathan is @nathanbottomley, Todd is @toddbeilby, and Richard is @RichardLStone. The Flight Through Entirety theme was arranged by Cameron Lam. You can follow the podcast on Twitter at @FTEpodcast.
We’re also on Facebook, and you can check out our website at flightthroughentirety.com. Please consider rating or reviewing us on iTunes, or we’ll simply come and take the grain. Don’t make us come over there.
Doctor Who in 10 Seconds
Brendan has been hard at work in the studio this week, which means that it won’t be too long before we get to see another episode of Doctor Who in Ten Seconds. While you wait, you can still watch all of the previous episodes, in which Brendan summarises 51 Doctor Who stories in no more than 10 seconds each. Make sure you subscribe to his YouTube channel, so that you are informed immediately when the Season 8 episode becomes available.
Bondfinger
We were so gutted by Rodge’s wildly premature departure from the Bond franchise, that we’ve been unable to bring ourselves to watch his successor in the role. Is he any good?
But, our duty to Queen and Country compels us to continue, which means that Bondfinger will return with our commentary on The Living Daylights (1987).
In the meantime, we have a range of Rodgecasts online, and other Bonds are also available, of course. You can keep up with all the Bondfinger news on Twitter and Facebook.
Episode 104: Planet Zog · Download (76.3 MB)
Transcript
Hello, dear listener, and welcome back to Flight Through Entirety, the only Doctor Who podcast who's under imminent danger foam of Bendrilops warhead.
Yes, all 500 of us.
I'm Brendan.
I'm Nathan.
I'm Todd, and it's that famous anagram lovers Doctor Who story, Timelash.
You know, sometimes with the Doctor Who story, a whole heap of elements come together, and here, you know, there's the script, there's the direction, the costuming, the set design, the music, and the actors' performances all come together to make this really an utterly, utterly horrific example of mid-80s Doctor Who.
There's not a single one of those elements that even reaches a minimal level of acceptability.
And so for me, this is easily Colin Baker's worst story and one of the worst stories in Doctor Who history.
Todd.
Okay.
I've criticised a lot of 80s stories and you know which ones I don't like.
For all of those elements that you have mentioned, right?
The script falls in upon itself, the costuming and the sets and various performances, some of which I quite like and some of which I think are just terrific.
But I can sit here and I can actually laugh away at it and enjoy, I actually quite enjoy episode one.
I think it completely collapses halfway through episode two.
If you were doing a bottom 10 of Doctor Who, it probably would make my number 10 in that list.
Right?
That's like 10th from the bottom.
That's right. from the bottom.
But unlike other things that I've been bored through or enraged by, for me, it's not the worst thing ever.
What do you think is going on here?
Like, what do you think they're aiming for?
It really is the most kind of generic set of space rebels in a bunch of space corridors.
Well, obviously they need, you know, this is the cheapy of the season, right?
So, but it's so underwritten. in that 2nd episode.
I mean, what is Eric Sabre doing?
Well, obviously he's off writing revelation of the Daleks and not script editing the 2nd episode of this in any way.
Does he write the big padding scene?
He does.
He does.
And a phrase, I don't use very often.
I think this is possibly only the 3rd time in the history of the podcast.
In Eric, say with his defence.
He did actually have to perform a ground up rewrite on this to the dialogue because the writer, Glenn McCoy, had never written for Doctor Who before and has never written for Doctor Who again.
He did have a proper career.
I mean he did write for things.
He wrote 4 things like Angels, and I believe, casualty.
You know, he was an up and coming writer, and that's part of the reason that they got him in.
The problem was, of course, you know, not being very experienced with Doctor Who.
We've also had massive problems with the previous story in broadcast 2 stories ago in production, the 2 doctors, of course, which had a rejected script from an American writer, then a rejected script from Bob Holmes because of the location change.
Eric Say would, of course, in some way or another wrote Attack of the Cybermen.
Even when this script was completed, Pennant Roberts read it, and he didn't like the way the characters spoke.
He said, this is a completely alien planet, and apparently it was written in very human vernacular and metaphor and similarly and that sort of thing.
So Eric Zaywood had to perform that ground up rewrite while he was, well, before he went off to write Revelation, because to write Revelation, he actually had to finish his contract to script editor first.
Well, I mean, if you need the dialogue not to sound like anything an actual human being from Earth would say, Eric, say, what's the right to get?
I think one of the things that sums up this story for me is the fact that in one of those 1st sequences with the 1st mail-in and his son-in-law, what's his name?
Men and Renis, and they go into that cubicle thing.
Oh, the power roof.
And he pulls off the power knob.
And then, so just he puts it back on and you actually see this happening.
How can the director not go?
That's not acceptable.
And a big problem I have with this is a lack of establishing shots.
It's very hard to get a sense of place.
Like we get one establishing shot of the citadel.
But we have no sense of scale.
You know, we don't know how big it is aside from the fact that it's got 500 people in it.
We know that.
Thank you.
Tyler or God, whatever you know.
We've got horrible 2 sill names.
Oh, yeah, but that's the other thing.
Everyone has, we had, you know, good names like Dastarian, Chesini, and we're going to have, you know, Tarkas and Lilt and Tassambika next week.
This week they all have horrific 2 syllable names.
They're all Kendron and Vina and Mecross and things.
They're all sort of terrible.
And there's a terrible scene early on where Me Cross and Vina are having an argument for no reason other than to explain the structure of this society to all. the people at home.
And I just can't possibly care about anyone on this planet.
There are 500 people in these sort of terrible space corridors.
Later on, when we learn that the Bender Lips warhead is heading to Carfell, we learn that there are 1000000s of lives at stake.
I bet I think that's written by Eric Saywood much later.
But I just don't care about them.
They are the planet Zog.
They're literally the Zog people being menaced by the Zog monster and I just don't care.
And there's really nothing here that we haven't seen done before a lot of times and done better.
And I do feel that Glenn McCoy has a feeling that this is the sort of thing that Doctor Who does, that does rebels in space corridors.
And it's clear that the high concept that he wants to pin this on is the time lash, and it's called time lash, and there's some timey stuff.
So when the borad shoots someone, they age, you know, the time lashes, this sort of fearsome thing, but the time lash looks like something in a light entertainment set, like something in a game show, and it's in no way impressive looking.
It's got those sort of tinsel lights, the sort of crappy sequins all over it, people just fade into it and scream.
You know, the lights go up like it's a special round on the weakest link, and that's what we're pinning it on.
And that's the only thing that distinguishes this from anything else.
And we've seen plenty of stories where the doctor comes in and overthrows for government, but the government is interesting in an interesting way or is a political satire in some way, but that's not what the show does anymore in this period.
So, you know, what do we learn here?
That dictatorships are bad.
It's really so empty.
And so there are bits that are charming, and there's one character in particular, whom I like a great deal, even though I think he's a mistake in some ways.
And who is that?
I really like her, but.
I adore her, but yeah.
Why couldn't we keep him on?
He would have been a great companion.
Look, in his 1st sequences with the doctor in that hut and he's trying to like exercise exorcise, not exercise.
Although he could do with that.
And then bash him with the book.
Like, I actually find it really funny and adorable.
He's charming, isn't he?
And in a bumbling sort of way, and he has a great relationship with the doctor.
And in that hideous padding scene in episode two, which Eric Seward had to write because the episode was running under time.
Like, Colin Baker's face, when he looks at Herbert, when Herbert's doing whatever.
And it just burst out laughing. like even though like the scene is complete padding.
There's something I like about her, but I don't like the, you know, the fact that he's revealed to be HD Wells and that sort of thing is...
Well, that's the bit that I think is stupid because he's nothing at all like HG Wells.
Yeah, HG Wells was a socialist and a Hugs list. you know.
Of course, he had religion growing up in the time he grew up in, but he was not devoutly religious and certainly was not sort of conscious of devils and probably wasn't experimenting with ouija boards.
I don't believe he was ever even a teacher.
He studied to be a teacher, but he never completed.
He was known as George.
Like he said, Herbert George Wells.
He was called George.
He had a northern accent, I think.
You know, like he's really nothing like her, but, and in a sense, that doesn't matter.
But if you're going to have a celebrity historical, and this is the 2nd celebrity historical this season, and the 1st time we've ever had celebrity historicals, actually.
Well, since Marco Polo.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, that's true.
So there's not very much point.
In fact, I think that the point is that this lamentably bad Doctor Who story is the inspiration for the science fiction career of one of the great science fiction writers of all time, who borrows the name Vina and the Morlockses and stuff.
The Island of Dr. Monroe, Invisible Man, all of that stuff.
And look, HG Wells was capable of some really incredible crap, if you've ever read in the days of a comet, which is just rubbish, but it has a political kind of socialist message.
You know, the idea that he was in any way inspired by this dreary runaround is really just kind of insulting.
It's a missed opportunity, isn't it?
The story could be political because it is about a rebellion against an oppressive government and you've got this really incredibly political science fiction writer, but we get no politics in this story.
After what you just said, I find it quite funny that this crummy doctor story actually ends up inspiring all of these works of literature.
Like I think there's something deliciously, well, just humourous in that.
If I was to do this, can I just indulge me for a moment?
Yeah, sort of fantasy directing.
So somebody out there can do this for me, right?
So I'd have, I'd have Mikos and the mail in about to go into the power room, have their scene, cut to the doctor and Perry in the TARDIS.
They know that the time tunnel thing's there and they're heading for like doomsday.
Cut back to the mainland being taken to the Borad, cut back to the doctor impairing the TARDIS, cut back to Mikos and Vina having a bit of a conversation to set the scene.
Cut back to the Dr. Imperi and the TARDIS cut back to the main being killed and our good friend Paul Darrow taking over, cut back to the Dr. Imperi and the TARDIS.
Like, you know, little brief snippets.
Then cut back to Paul Darrow's striding in and saying, you know, your father's dead, right?
Cut back to the doctor and Miriam Matata.
Cut back to, you know, that pathetic person that pleads for Gazak, his people.
What's the, I don't even know what the lines of dialogue are, but you know, he pleads for his people.
He gets shoved down the time lash. doesn't it all hell break loose at that point?
or am I am I?
Yeah, and that's where Vina.
Okay, steel...
Cut back to the doctor.
Imperi Natana's, Vina goes through, right?
Cut back to Carfell, and then you cut to the TARDIS coming up the corridor.
It's just such a bad.
But then you cut to the boy going, it appears the doctor is making a return visit to Carfell. queue opening title sequence.
Or end of episode, right?
Right?
So you're just doing a huge edit on all of those things.
Because in that 1st sequence of stuff, you see like bland corridors of those that robot thing and people getting captured and you don't care.
Like, I think the girl's okay.
The rebel cats.
Yeah, she's actually she's actually quite good.
Vina, I, I'm just going to say this.
I absolutely adore her in this entire story, the fact that she's obviously on Xanax or something, except that that one sequence where she has to get up on a chair and stop the Borhead from looking through his video monitor or whatever she does.
But I really love her performance.
It's just so wooden.
It's just I just love it, you know?
And then we just constantly spaced out.
And then having Nikos going, you're just a figurehead.
I love his little performance.
Pour down nearly acceptable.
Nicola looks fantastic, right?
Yeah, 1st proper decent outfit she's had.
I think the highlight scene for me, the highlight, the whole thing, which I just burst out laughing every time, is when Paul Darrow's character gets killed by the borat, and the skeleton drops to the floor, the skull goes, thump.
Thump.
It's a double bang on the floor.
I remember this as a kid and I just burst out laughing and I just wait for that moment every time it is the moment I wait for.
His little sidekick, Kendron, might be one of the worst before.
Like, I think he makes some Leonard Sachs look like, you know, Robert De Niro, frankly.
I have been faithful to you.
Doesn't the boy do obey with him too?
Yes.
He's got this giant IMDb page.
He's in a Bond film.
Like he's in tomorrow, never dies.
He's in the last king of Scotland.
He's got a proper career.
He looks like he is from the year 10 production of an inspector calls.
He's so bad.
I love the fact that he's so bad and so feeble and so crap and meets that end.
I just take perverse pleasure.
That's what I take.
The 1st pleasure, you know, performances and things in this that are just going to, that's so crap, but I'm laughing with it and going with it.
Pennant Roberts was actually trying to get him into Doctor Who for ages.
He was meant to be either Tomas or Caleb in the face of evil.
He was meant to be one of the principal younger men.
And I'm so glad we didn't get him because Leslie Schofield and the really hot chap who plays Tomas, whose name I can't remember.
They're perfect in those roles.
He's not replacing Tomas ever.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Or David Garfield.
That was a really good looking cast.
Can we go back there?
Something I do love in this story, though, is the HG Wells references aren't hammered into your skull.
They are subtle Easter eggs there for people who either know the works of HG Wells or...
And this is possibly a bit ambitious after they watch the story might go and read some HG Wells, which is very much in keeping with what Colin Baker wanted the program to be. wanted it to inspire children to learn new words and new ideas.
This to me feels like a 1960s story.
This was another one I took Richard's advice and watched him black and white and it really lifts it.
Another way I look at this story to help me get through it, is it's another example, and there's so much of it this season of making it like a Shakespeare.
So you have your principal cast.
You have the doctor, you have Perry, you have Tekka, the Borad, Herbert, and they're sort of the bigger characters and everyone else fades into the background a little bit.
Literally in the case of some of their costumes.
And Tekka's characterisation, Paul Darrow's performance is magnetic to watch.
I really hate it.
I really, really hate it.
I love it.
People going over the top.
I love Jackie Pierce last week.
I thought she was glorious.
He's horrible to watch.
And they lost so much studio time because they kept having to order retakes because he was putting in even more than that.
But I really like it. sabotaging it.
Well, I do wonder that sometimes because famously, and we'll come back to this next week, um, this is sort of a two-part anecdote, Colin Baker played Babe in the Butcher in an episode of Blake 7 in a very similar way to Paul Darrow playing techa here, but arguably better. enjoyable in that episode.
Well, I find Paul Darrow enjoyable here as well, but I do sometimes wonder if Paul Darrow is playing it like this because of the way Colin Baker came into his show to play that.
But I think that's an urban myth and I think it's something that people have suggested and then he's played on.
That's what I think.
I mean, the other thing is that, you know, he had an argument with John Nathan Turner about what he was doing.
Well, he wanted to be Richard III.
He literally wanted to have a hump.
But I do find it so hilarious when he goes like, we'll do a tour of the citadel for your assistant.
And then he has that plant and shoves that plant into the doctor's face or whatever.
Like, these little things like that I do like, but I do get the fact that it is such an overthrop performance.
You're either going to...
I think you can't be in the gray area.
You either really love it or you really don't, and I can understand exactly where you're coming from, but for me, it's sort of like it's the, it's one thing that keeps me glued to the screen when there's other beige sets with beige people with, you know, things I don't really care about.
I actually think that Colin's visibly uncomfortable acting opposite him.
And it could just be me reading into it.
But I just think that Colin doesn't like it.
When was this recorded in order?
No, it is the 2nd last story recorded?
It is the 2nd last because suddenly Collins kind of horrible.
And again, I think it's Collins studio problem.
That 1st scene with Perry and all that stuff in the TARDIS.
He's just obnoxious.
I put that down again to say word and having to have these delaying tactics before we get to whatever and it's another one of these bitch scenes.
I don't think it's as bad as Varos.
But it is like, okay, at this point in the season, we don't really need it anymore.
No, that's right.
It was actually even worse in the script.
There's a line in the script to the effect of...
The doctor says, while Perry's in the room, but not directly to her, This girl vexes me so much, I might as well kill myself.
Well, I'm glad they didn't do that.
Well, it's Pennant Roberts, Colin Baker, and Nicola Bryant just said, no, we're not doing this anymore.
For me, there's only one bit of that scene that's really bad and that's when he screams bad at her and she cringes.
You know, that's really horrible.
The rest of it, I don't mind so much like when he's giving this description of this place and she's like, that's exactly what you say about the eyebrow.
And he has a tank.
And another thing I actually really love is the beginning of that padding scene where Perry's insisting on coming with him and they're actually showing genuine concern and affection for one another.
And it's it's a really good balance for the characters because it's it's sort of the equivalent of that scene in the hand of fear where I worry about you, but I worry about you.
But these 2 characters would never quite put it in those words.
They're both a little bit too proud.
So it turns into an argument.
But I agree with you, and I do like that bit because you know the doctor is concerned and wants her out of the Tartar, in case he doesn't come back.
And I do like that bit of it.
The thing that gets to me is the fact that episode one was overrunning by several minutes, and Pennant Roberts wanted to move the cliffhanger earlier, he felt there was a point and the rest of that stuff could go into episode 2 and they wouldn't be a problem.
John Nathan Turner wouldn't have it.
Yeah, because the episode cliffhanger had to be the doctor in peril, where Pennant wanted to move it was Perry in peril.
It was the scene where they're in the caves and she realises she's dropped the note and the guards burst in and shoot one of the rebels.
And Pennant said, look, I've got these shots.
I can make it look like Perry's been shot.
Like Tomb of the Cybermen, episode 3 where we don't know who's been shot.
And it's like, actually, that would have worked.
But instead, yeah, they had to cut stuff out of episode one to make it fit and then put this stuff into episode two.
Even then, there was some stuff they managed to move out of episode one into episode two, like Perry being dragged along to the Morlocks, but that creates this kind of weird thing where she's dragged along and tied up near a Morlocks, and then she's dragged back to a cell, and then she's dragged back to the Morlocks again.
I hate that.
I hate that she has a thing around her neck and she's being dragged along.
I think that this story, it may be, apart from that scene in Twin Dilemma, might be the worst treatment that Perry receives.
It's the 2nd time this season where she's going to be transformed into something against her will.
She's tied up and menaced by the least convincing alien threat since...
Brontosaur penis head.
Yeah, it's awful.
And it is like you joke about, you know, brontosaur penis head, but it is phallic.
It is, you know, a phallus tentatus.
She is pathetic in her response to it.
She just screams until a man comes along and rescues her.
And kudos to Herbert, who I think is lovely and gets to have a hero moment there rescuing Perry, but it's just pathetic that Perry needs rescuing again.
And the threat is she's going to be forced to breed with the Borad.
So it's sexual, you know, and when she says, don't I get a say in this at the very end, and the doctor says, no, of course not, shut up, which is meant to be a funny line, Colin delivers it that way, it's just a little bit depressing, but that's exactly the point.
And this is where the whole thing falls down is because the moment she goes on the tour of the citadel, she's just then there's a victim, right?
Which is so 1960s and should not be now in the 1980s.
Even the 1960s didn't do it that much.
But the Borads plan is insane.
Like, he's not even going to breed with a person from his own planet, and it all comes down to the fact that this gas and the thing has to attack her at the, like, there's no scientific, reasonable rhyme.
The doctor even calls him out on that.
You know, he says that's hardly a scientific experiment.
Where's your control?
Couldn't he clone a whole bunch of borants as well, given that he has a few spares in his closet somewhere?
Do you know, every time I watch this story, I forget the terrific plot trist that he's cloned himself, right?
I always forget, and then it's like, well, we've got 15 minutes to go, what's going to happen?
Then suddenly it's a clone and I'm going, every time I watch it, I forget.
Yeah, and is that with a different coloured eye as well?
I think the makeup, I think the makeup on the borat.
Yeah, is great.
And his performance is great.
And I love his little set thing, you know, you know, I do like that set and I don't mind not in the timelash set, which looks like, but that other big set, like, is quite good, but then all the other sets are just rubbish.
But I like the Borad stuff.
Okay?
I do like Paul Darrow at times.
I think Colin gives a good performance in what is a terrible script.
But when we're in the time lash room and the doctor has the crystal thing, okay?
So he stands there and he turns it off, right?
Now, surely it should then project him there.
He should move away to the console.
The bride should then fire the laser to this projection.
Then the doctor should move to the console, we should fire it there.
So he's actually not in the beam, but the way it shot is he's still standing as the beam goes through him.
So he should technically drop dead.
It's wrong.
We've had a 15, 20 minute scene of him explaining how that thing works and then it doesn't work directed incorrectly.
He is shot with that beam.
It's really bad.
I don't understand how the director could get it that wrong in that sequence.
It's really an app.
I actually think that there is something slightly sweet about that and that he has a gun that sends you back in time and he has a magic time crystal that does things and clearly the story was meant to be about a society that uses time as a weapon or something like that.
Yeah, in Glenn McCoy's original outline, there was a lot more about time and also his original outline was a Dalek story.
The Daleks were going to be the bandrels invading this planet, and it was going to be about the car felons fighting them off, and Eric Saywood said, no, sorry, I'm writing the Dalek story.
So that didn't happen.
Oh, the banjals.
The bandreals are coming.
The glove puppets are coming.
I love the bandals.
They are actually 30 foot tall cyborg.
I love them and I love all that stuff and I also love, you may remember this.
Friends of the podcast, Simon Moore, Peter Griffithson, I think Kate Orman, back many years ago, when they was film students, did a re-edit of that, and Simon had a sock on his hand, and so he does the whole Bandral thing with this sock, and I just let, and the final sequence was when it drops out of sight reminds me of the drashings.
I wish I had I think I've got it on video.
I need to dig it up, but it was just so funny.
Like, I love the band draws.
But in that padding scene, the doctor could have explained something about using the crystal to deflect the, you know, just some bit of dialogue in there rather than what we get when he gets back and he says to Perry, oh, I'll tell you later.
We get no explanation as to how that happens.
And I just sit there going, if you're going to write a padding scene, give me some scientific, you know, mumbo jumbo.
Give me something.
And there was, in the script, there was a technobabble explanation.
It still didn't make any sense, but there's no reason to cut it.
I mean, Colin Baker was not John Bertwick.
Colin Baker could do techno babble, for God's sake.
Speaking of which, this is the other thing that gets to me with this story. is the fact that we have to then have this continuity thing where it's referencing a previous adventure that the perjury doctor has gone on, which no one has ever seen.
Like, you know, I'm sure when they pitch this, they might have thought, oh, fans will get something out of this.
Ooh, it's an adventure we've never seen, but to the general public, they'd be going like, well, you know, it's an alienating thing.
It's another continuity thing.
And the fact that M Perry has to be versed in having like who Joe Grant is and we have to have the locket with Joe. And then it seems at one moment, there's one companion, but in the dialogue, it's like, oh, there's only one of you this time.
So there must have been somebody else.
Mike Yates.
Well, that's the only one that could be, you know?
I think Paul Cornell reconed that in speed of flight.
I think that was written by Paul Cornell.
And at the end, sort of, that's Mike Yates going off and having an adventure with the doctor and Joe, and at the end, they're heading to Carfell in the epilogue.
Oh wow.
But, you know, as a kid, I kind of liked, you know, the shattering of the mirror wall or whatever it is and the picture of them.
Like, I liked that, like, as a little nerd fanboy.
But I think it's just, it robs, it robs the story of them having to prove who they are to the rebels or to who's trying to overthrow and, and I just don't like that in Doctor Who, where it's some person we've met before.
Like it's just a shorthand.
It's just a shorthand to get into it without really having a payoff.
There's a real problem we've said before about continuity in this era.
And I've said that when they do it, they get it wrong like last week.
And now here we have just completely invented continuity.
And, you know, if having continuity references has any value at all, and, you know, the new series has shown that it does, is that you get a flicker of recognition from longtime fans, you know, I love the recreation of the 1st doctor's TARDIS console room towards the end of series nine.
I thought that stuff was really great But here, now we're inventing continuity and putting it in and it's hard to know what possible reason we could have it.
And I think it is because Glenn McCoy has got the idea that that's the sort of thing that Doctor Who does.
Yeah, I remember years ago.
When Doctor Who magazine started doing their special editions, they do 3 of a year.
Their 1st run was special editions based on the doctors.
So there was the complete 6th doctor, and the forward, I believe, was written by Gareth Roberts.
And he has a wonderful line in that where he says, in this era of the show, the doctor becomes the show's fetishistic raison d'etre.
And if you look at this past season and the twin dilemma, Vengeance on Baros is the only story where people don't know who Time Lords are.
Yeah, that's boring, isn't it?
I hate the constant references to regeneration that we get throughout this year.
You know, it just reminds us that Colin never gets to be the doctor.
He's always the 6th doctor and even that terrible, terrible nickname for him that you used the other day in chat.
What, 60?
Yeah, don't ever say that in my presence again. acknowledges the fact that he's just one of many doctors and the references to regeneration do that as well.
And I hate it.
Yeah.
I mean, the bit with the Borat referring to his ability to regenerate, like that won't save you.
That was put in, you know, because fans might object, but I think it's something that takes you out of the moment.
It's kind of like at every episode ending and every time the doctor's under threat, we have to shoehorn some dialogue in explaining, yes, we're aware that the doctor regenerates, you know, like, do we have to do that?
The show got on for like 14, 15, 16 years without it.
And, you know, we've got the continuity of the doctor having met the Borad when he was a scientist, some sort of past history that, you know, really in the end means nothing.
Yeah.
It would be an interesting touch if we didn't do it so often already.
Like, you know, in recent stories we've had as male, we've had the cyber controller, who we're meant to believe, at least in mind, is the same cyber controller, as the doctor had previously met, we've had the master and the Rani.
We've had Destari, who's an old friend of the doctors.
In a way, it's a bit more valid in the story because this story needs a bit more depth.
But as you say, it doesn't mean much in the end.
You know, it's just this line of, yes, we've met before, doctor, and it's like, well, so bloody what?
You know, I really would, I really think if they'd done a complete edit of this whole thing, like as a, as a 45 minute or 50 minute episode and really cut it down, a 10 minute children in need episode.
Well, yes, that's extreme.
Like, you know, the edit that I was talking about earlier, but then going through part 2 and just really just it's the borat and it's the missile coming and just leave it at that and really cut it back.
You might have something that's acceptable and ditch a lot of this other continuity stuff.
I mean, all the stuff with the rebels and the Felch and rocks and that sort of thing is just like...
Like, who cares?
You know, there is one thing this story gets right that rarely gets done right in this era and that's letting the doctor solve the problem.
And so the doctor does something clever.
He tricks the borad into shooting himself with his own laser, so he defeats him without, you know, just gunning him in the face.
Then he sacrifices himself to save them from the oncoming missile.
You know, he does have a proper role in resolving the story.
The oncoming missile, though, is absolutely ruined by the fact that there is that 10 minute padding scene in the middle of it that robs it of any urgency whatsoever.
So the missiles coming, but we have time to bitch and talk in the TARDIS for ages and ages.
Yeah, I find that scene so charming.
You know, it's almost the opposite of that 7 minute scene I mentioned last week in Dastari's office, which had a few moments of charm. but just feels like it should have been interspersed with other things, whereas having this almost in real time with just one cutaway back there, it lets George Chandler as Herbert shine a little bit more as well because he goes from being all gung-ho and oh, we're going to save the world too.
Oh, I didn't realise we were going to die.
I sit between you two.
Like, I mean, I know it's padding.
There's parts of it that I like and there's other parts where I'm going to go, like, give me more, give me explanations, that sort of thing.
I think it just robs the story of pace at a time when it really needs it because that's a really dramatic bit.
There's no music either.
I think the music here is extremely inept, but there's no music there to help sell it.
You know, like we're all in terrible danger, but it's all word peril.
We just have the banjals telling us they've sent a missile.
We have a lot of standing around in the TARDIS talking about this terrible missile.
All of that.
We only have the budget for one bandrol ship.
So the other 2 ships of the fleet are represented by little green asterisks.
The music is by Elizabeth Parker, who, unless I'm very much mistaken, is Doctor Who's 1st female incidental music composer, I know we've had like the Delian mode in Inferno, but that wasn't written specifically for it.
And I think she may remain to date, Doctor Who's only female music composer.
And she's not back again, is she ever?
No, no.
But she had done a lot of work on Blake 7.
Yeah, in fact, there's only one episode of Blake 7 that isn't scored by Dudley Simpson, and that's the episode that Dougie Campfield directs called Duel in season one.
Of course, Dougie Campfield wouldn't have anything to do with Dudley Simpson.
And so Elizabeth Parker does do the incidental music on that.
Right, just the one episode then.
But you did do sound and stuff, I think. right.
I have to say, I do like the fact that the doctor and Perry are pleased to see each other at the end. really nice. you know?
It's nice moment.
Now, can you tell me what the fake cliffhangers are for episode one and 3 in the Australian edits?
Is it, it appears the doctor is making return visit or have I got that wrong?
I thought it was just before that I thought it was.
And don't go wandering off.
Yes, sir.
Yeah.
And what about in episode three?
Is it Perry versus the Morlocks?
Is that a cliffhanger?
Yes.
So that at least feels like a proper cliffhanger.
And it kind of has her scream leading into the cliffhanger.
Right.
And the actual cliffhanger in the middle is...
He's also going into the time lash.
Goodbye, doctor.
Unpleasant journey with a close-up on Colin's face. doing that tongue thing.
Yeah.
Oh, I'm in the pain is never...
And we get a crash zoom on the time.
Timelash as well.
Oh, can I just say another continuity thing?
Another continuity thing, right?
So the time lash, like the doctor suffers the terrible threat that he might end up in 12th century Scotland or something. you know, and we already kind of know that.
At the end, the Borad goes through the time, she should do and ends up as the Loch Ness Monster.
Because we've never had a Doctor Who story that explains the Loch Ness monster before.
Not only do we have 3 Atlantis, we now have 2 Loch Ness Monsters.
It's Doctor Who, it's imperfect.
I laugh at that.
Okay, I agree.
I agree.
But it's something that you think that they would they care about that in this year.
So why are they doing that?
Where's Ian Levine?
he on holiday?
Fans pointed that out and John Nathan Turner's response was exactly what you just said, well, there's 2 of them now.
Right. lovely.
Lovely.
Something this story comes in for criticism of.
I don't think I've said this explicitly, but yeah, I quite enjoy this one.
I enjoy it more than the 2 doctors, but something the story comes into criticism of is the doctor's dispatching of the 2nd Borad.
Well, in a sense, I don't mind that.
And there is something fairy tale about him being defeated by the side of a mirror, and it really, you know, the story is leading up to it.
It's laid in the mirror thing, it's deliberately designed sets that look incredibly boring and dull as Perry points out because of the mirror thing and his anxiety about how he looks.
And so, like, I've already talked about the awful dialogue between the doctor and Perry and the fact that once again, Perry's going to be forcibly bred with an all of that's awful.
But, you know, like, I think that having him shrinking away from the mirror is fine, I think there's no way that he can't end up being pushed in the timelash, you know, the narrative, just, yeah, heading towards that.
Yeah, I mean, some people have said he's bullying the Borat based on his looks and I watched this story in a new light this time based on current political events.
Tekka is Trump because Tekka has no idea how to do his job.
So he just makes grandiose claims and calls up their nearby allies and says, no, we're not going to give you any grain.
Sure, what are you going to do?
Bomas kind of thing.
Whereas.
So who's the Borat?
Well, that's the thing.
I was looking at...
Steve Bannon.
I was looking at that scene going.
People always say, is it all right for the doctor to throw the ball out in the time lash.
And another part of my brain just said, is it all right to punch a Nazi in the face?
And it's like, well, you know what?
It's always all right for the doctor to throw a dictator down a pit.
Yeah, yeah.
And we might look at that and go, well, the doctors can be violent.
Well, what else is he going to do in that situation?
We keep coming back to this with Colin?
And it's a way it didn't quite happen with Peter.
I know you kind of raised Nathan that, for instance, in Resurrection of Dialect.
It's a situation the doctor shouldn't be put in.
Whereas in these situations where Colin has to attack cybermen or Shockeye or the Borad.
It feels like more of a natural progression than the doctor saying I have to go kill Davros.
Yeah, it's a situation he has to react to, which in itself is a problem, which the next script editor will seek to redress, that the doctor is a reactionary character now.
I think that pushing the Borad isn't really particularly violent, and it's more like tripping Eldred with your scarf, you know?
Yeah, it's very different from sort of gunning someone in the face, I think.
And even different from poisoning shock eye last week.
I think it's hard to object to.
One of the puzzling things in this story for me as a kid was the robot.
And the fact that the burning one gets sent back in time.
Actually, I quite like that.
I think it's good.
Like, I like it now, but I never understood as a kid that there were actually different ones.
I just thought it was the same one.
And so it always confused me.
And dear listeners, this was the 1st time I actually worked it out that it was actually a different one.
The 1st time.
Bestie doesn't say very much, does she?
No she doesn't.
Oh dear.
Okay, ratings.
I just want to take a moment.
I'd like to apologise to the 1000000s of people who saw this on 1st transmission.
Well, believe it or not, episode one, got 6.7 million.
So 200,000 less people than the previous week. decided not to tune in.
But that did put it 69th on the chart for the week, which is, you know, still above Attack of the Cybern in part one, which got 8.9 million.
So, episode 2 then jumps up to 7.4, which I think is the weaker episode of the 2 by far.
But it falls 10 places on the chart to 79th.
So again, as I said previously, what's going on, like everything's all over the place, but suddenly, since the cancellation, which was at 6 million, we're now back to 7.4 million.
So interesting.
Bit of a rise, but for the completely the wrong episode.
Maybe they liked episode one, you know, these things, you'd like an episode, people tune in, and then episode 2 of train wreck.
There are still things I like in episode two, though, that we haven't talked about.
Like, I actually really like the bit where they lock themselves up in the time lash room.
As a kid, I had no, I loved the journey inside the time lash, that felt dynamic and exciting to me as a child.
I look at it now and yes, I can see the bloody gaffer tape holding on the stanchions and I know that Colin was being slowly emasculated by a Kirby harness.
They're all kind of rubbing themselves in a suggestive way up and down these sort of polystyrene crystals.
You remember when the John Nathan Turner era was really visually inventive?
Remember we would get Peter Grimwade in and do something really remarkable with the way the show looked?
This looks vastly worse than the show did back when Graham Williams had no money.
Yeah, I think what's really coming back to bite John Nathan Turner. is his reluctance to use people with more experience than himself.
And, you know, slowly we've seen he's escalated a disagreement with Peter Grimwade into him never directing for the show again.
And they're never writing for the show again.
Yeah, well, and even then when he did write one more script, it was only because Eric Saywood went behind JNT's back.
You know, we've lost Lovett, Bickford and Paul Joyce, who were the best directors of his 1st season, but it was just kind of like, well, no, they've taken too much time.
It's like rather than work with them.
They were just never invited back again.
And instead, we get Ron Jones and Peter Moffat keep getting work and Pennant Roberts, who is not necessarily a bad director, but by this point is incredibly lacklustre.
You know, I think the only story he's really put in an amazing amount of work visually was the face of evil.
He's another one who's an actor's director, but you know, you look at the sun makers.
You look at Warriors of the Deep.
He doesn't really care that much about set design so long as he's got a set to shoot.
But what you've got here in this season is I think every other story, for me in this season, has, has, I think, interesting sets and good location work and there's theatrics and I like, like every other one.
This one, it's sort of like, okay, we spent our money on everything else and the thing coming up, there is no money, right?
We've only got these big sets that we can't do much with.
And again, as you were saying, like he's casting people who just aren't delivering performances.
And that combined with the script.
I'm going, that's what you said at the beginning, all these things mount up.
I don't mind Collins coating this because it's very colourful compared to everything else.
Everything else. it's not on earth, so it tends to work.
I've spent a lot of this podcast criticising a lot of elements, but I will say this, that when I actually did watch it, I actually enjoyed large chunks of it, and then there are other things that I just think need to be edited out.
Like 35 minutes of this needs to be edited out and all the peri stuff needs to be edited out and it just needs, you know, to make something that's better.
I don't particularly hate it.
But there are just all of these problems.
But I've defended John Nathan Turner's ability to handle money and get things done, but in this case, that is not the case.
Is he just tired?
Why would you as the producer allow this to be as visually a train wreck as it is?
Look, I think he's learned something from the previous year, at least, where their big blockbuster story is at least the last story of this season instead of the 2nd last one.
And, you know, we were mystified by just the horrific cheapness of the twin dilemma.
Now we've got horrific cheapness, but at least it's not being done at the end of the season.
So it's hidden in the 2nd last story.
This is the Doctor Who equivalent of what they will come to call on Star Trek, a bottle show.
So there were scripts written for Star Trek Next Generation, which is now only 2 years away as we talk about the story.
There were scripts written for that which were specifically designed to use standing sets and maybe one planet set.
Now, very often what they would do for those shows is they would do something character based, something philosophical.
A very good early one is called where silence has lease, where they're at the mercy of this intelligence, which is, which is testing and trialling them.
I know not everyone considers it to be brilliant.
That thing with a cat face, is it?
Yeah, Gila.
Oh, Brandon.
But the thing is, Doctor Who could have done something like that for once.
It could have done a whole story set in the Tartar, which we hadn't had for a while, you can still have guest actors and you can make it interesting and trippy.
But instead they do this 1960 story.
If you look at this like a 1960s story, I think you enjoy it a lot more, but as you said earlier, Nathan, there's no excuse for why we're doing a 1960s story.
The corridors outside of the borad and that main timelash set are lamentable and all of the caves are just useless.
And that, the caves need to, we needed 2 days of location work on caves to just to try and lift it.
You know, you might remember back in the dawn of time when we were doing Planet of the Daleks, and all of a sudden, they're outdoors for one sequence.
For the ice cano or something like that.
And it just breaks that, you know?
And this script needed to be written so that you could film it indoors completely and that is not the case.
I think if we're going to the 60s, and I think the nearest analogue for this is probably the savages.
And I think the savages as a story is absolutely superior to this in every possible respect.
It had a message.
Yeah, it actually had a proper political message and this liked that.
It had memorable characters.
It even had a little sword of character arc for Stephen, but it was just so much better done.
And I think by now, we've had all of these elements so many times, our expectations that the program will be inventive and will say something worth saying, our expectations that that will happen have virtually evaporated by now.
And I think that we're trudging towards the end of the program and something needs to happen to the creative team, to save it from disaster.
Yeah, I feel like this tries to have a message about Daytones.
With the whole, there's a nuclear missile coming and it's going to wipe us out.
But there's perhaps one flicker of that in one scene, it's so thin, you know, it yeah, exactly.
Not firing missiles at people is good, not having missiles fired at you is good.
Those are important messages that we can take from timelash.
You know, that's something the script could have been hinged around and we could have, like the rebels are just rebelling because they're rebels.
If the rebels had been rebelling because we know we're on the brink of war and we could be annihilated and we must find a way to make peace.
All of a sudden, you have a story arc.
And it doesn't take a rocket scientist to come up with that idea.
Why they rebelling?
Exactly.
You know, were there other scripts sitting in Eric Saywood's desk at the time that were better than this that could have been made?
With some editing.
Now, I know big finish have done a season of missing episodes.
I think Song of the Magatra was there.
I think there was...
Song of the Space Whale, which is Song of the Menapjra.
And Leviathan, which is another one.
I don't want to go into too much detail of this because I think we're going to do a podcast on the missing. season coming up.
But there are scripts there.
Now, whether it's because of budget, like they're too bit expensive.
But then to say we're still going to go ahead with this.
Look, I don't hate the whole thing.
I can actually honestly sit down and watch this, unlike other Davison's that I never want to watch again.
I would sit down and watch this and I can laugh with it and laugh at it, but there are bits where I have to fast forward, right?
Yeah, it's not the worst of the worst for me, but it's very cheap on every level.
Thankfully, dear listeners, we're departing the planet car fell, and unlike doctor in this story, we're actually gonna go rescue all those poor buggers who were in 12th century Scotland.
But do come back next week as we wrap up this season with Revelation of the Daleks.
Until then, you can find us online at Flightthrough Entire he.sexy, flight through entirety on Facebook and iTunes and at FTE podcast on Twitter.
Over on Bondfinger, we either will shortly be starting or have just started the lengthy Timothy Dalton era of Bond films, and you can find all preceding Bond films there as well.
Bondfinger.com Bondfinger on Facebook and iTunes, Bondfingercast on Twitter.
Don't forget you can vote for your choice of pertwee commentary.
The choices are Spearhead from Space, the Mutants, the 3 Doctors, and Death to the Daleks, and also we have our upcoming Colin Baker Big Finish special episode.
So try to get yourself some copies of Jubilee, the one doctor, Doctor Who, and the Pirates, and Chris Cross.
Until next week, may none of your Androids be confusingly played by the same actor.
Thank you very much for listening and good night.
Good night.
See you at the Falchion Rock.
That was Flight through Entirety, starring Todd Beelby, Nathan Bottomley, and Brendan Jones, theme arrangement by Cameron Lamb.
This episode, Planet Zog, was recorded on the 11th of February 2017.
The next episode will be released on the 5th of March.
Nearing retirement age, why not start a new life on the planet Carfell.
It's a beautiful place, and its complete lack of reflective surfaces means that you won't even realise when you start to really let yourself go.
I think that's probably it.
Yeah, that's good.
I'm actually just looking up.
Missing stories from season 22.
We could have had the 1st Sontarans.
But they wouldn't have done that because they've just had this on Tyrance.
And there's one by, isn't there one by JP Hammond or something?
That's next season.
We could have had the Guardians of Prophecy, which big finish, mate.
Terrible.
The Johnny Burn.
That's awful.
Hexagora.
Well, what became Hexagonora?
Um, There just must have been...
The other scripts must have been too expensive to make.
That's all I can say.
I think it's probably that thing about not hiring like Nathan Turner's reluctance to hire good riders because he was threatened by them. threatened by them, rather, you know, it's like we need new people.
The whole thing's gone horribly toxic.
And we've criticised Eric Saywood a lot, but I think, you know, I mean, I love this season.
Like I've, you know, I've said it a 1000 times.
I still love it.
I love it.
Floors and all, I think Doctor 2 is imperfect and I feed off the imperfections in this.
But the decisions that John Nathan Turner is making now at this point. are not benefitting the show.
They benefitting him.
Yeah.
And that is that is the one criticism I will now have of him.
Yeah, except, you know, when he's working with Bid Meaden when he's working with Kart Mall.
So there's something about the relationship between the 2 of them.
That's the problem.
But now, but he's in this corner now where it's like, you know, all those wanting to get out, he's...
If he does, the show's gone.
We could have had a story written by Ian Marta.
Called Volvoc.
I would totally have been up for that.
I think we should wrap this one up.
Yeah, definitely.
Okay.
